5

The Thin Blue Line's Information Section

 

Home page

 

 

 

The little corner

CRIMES ACT 1914

The Blue Bar of the Law

CRIMES ACT 1914 SECT 23G

23G Right to communicate with friend, relative and legal practitioner
(1)
Subject to section 23L, if a person is under arrest for a Commonwealth offence, an investigating official must, before starting to question the person, inform the person that he or she may:
(a)
communicate, or attempt to communicate, with a friend or relative to inform that person of his or her whereabouts; and
(b)
communicate, or attempt to communicate, with a legal practitioner of the person's choice and arrange, or attempt to arrange, for a legal practitioner of the person's choice to be present during the questioning;

and the investigating official must defer the questioning for a reasonable time to allow the person to make, or attempt to make, the communication and, if the person has arranged for a legal practitioner to be present, to allow the legal practitioner to attend the questioning.

(2)
Subject to section 23L, if a person under arrest for a Commonwealth offence wishes to communicate with a friend, relative or legal practitioner, the investigating official holding the person under arrest must:
(a)
as soon as practicable, give the person reasonable facilities to enable the person to do so; and
(b)
in the case of a communication with a legal practitioner—allow the legal practitioner or a clerk of the legal practitioner to communicate with the person in circumstances in which, as far as practicable, the communication will not be overheard.
(3)
Subject to section 23L, if a person under arrest for a Commonwealth offence arranges for a legal practitioner to be present during the questioning, the investigating official holding the person under arrest must:
(a)
allow the person to consult with the legal practitioner in private and provide reasonable facilities for that consultation; and
(b)
allow the legal practitioner to be present during the questioning and to give advice to the person, but only while the legal practitioner does not unreasonably interfere with the questioning.
Another little corner