|
History
Of Fingerprinting Part
2

Herschel's
main role as a fingerprint pioneer lies in the area of the
immutability of ridged skin also mentioned by Faulds. Throughout his
life, Herschel took his own fingerprints and noted that no change
had occurred in them in over 50 years. He also had a small
collection of about 20 sets of fingerprints and used his technique
of handprinting to detect forgeries of legal documents. The
fingerprints taken from prisoners were also of great interest to
him, and he had the opportunity to see the same prisoners
fingerprinted several times over a number of years with no change
occurring in their fingerprints.
Although his interest in fingerprints predates that of Faulds,
Herschel did not make his feelings known and did not suggest that he
had developed a method of registering and identifying criminals, nor
did he foresee any crime scene application as Faulds had done.
|
|
Sir
Francis Galton
|
In
1892, a noted English scientist of the time, Sir Francis Galton,
published an accurate and in-depth study of the fingerprinting
science that included an attempt at a system of fingerprint
classification to facilitate the handling of large collections of
fingerprints. Although Galton's work proved to be sound and became
the foundation of modern fingerprint science and technology, his
approach to classification was inadequate, and it was to be others
who were to successfully apply his work.
Juan
Vucetich, an Argentinian police officer, research the science of
fingerprints, corresponded with Galton, then devised his own system
of fingerprint classification, which he called
"icnofalagometrico". This system was put into practice in
September 1891, and in March 1892, Vucetich opened the first
fingerprint bureau at San Nicholas, Buenos Aires. Within a short
time of the bureau being set up, the first conviction by means of
fingerprint evidence in a murder trial was obtained. In June 1892 at
Necochea, Francisca Rojas claimed that she had been brutally attacked
and her two children murdered by a neighbouring ranch worker named
Velasquez. Velasquez was arrested but refused to confess to the
murder of the two children. Nine days after the crime, a search of
the crime scene was carried out and a number of fingerprints in
blood were found on a door post pf the woman's hut. The post was
taken to the fingerprint bureau for comparison with the inked
fingerprint impressions of Velasquez. They were not identical, but
the blood impressions were found to be identical with those of
Rojas. When confronted with this evidence, Rojas confessed to the
murder of her children, and in July 1892 she was found guilty of
their murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.
|
|
Sir
Edward Henry
|
An
Englishman, Sir Edward Henry, who had been given tuition in
fingerprints by Galton, devised a workable classification system
independently of Vucetich and implemented it in India in 1897. Henry
published his book Classification and Uses of Fingerprints in 1900.
In 1901, Henry was appointed Assistant Commissioner of Police
at New Scotland Yard and began to introduce his fingerprint system
into that institution. By the end of that year, the Fingerprint
Office at New Scotland Yard was fully functional, the first British
court conviction by fingerprints being obtained in 1902.
Approximately 10 years after the publication of Henry's book, his
classification system was being used by police forces and prison
authorities throughout the English-speaking world.
Page Design ©
Ian Hunter.
Content © Christopher J Lennard BSc(hons), PhD and Trevor
Patterson Det. Sen Sgt New South Wales Police Service. |
|