5

The Thin Blue Line's Information Section

 

 

 

 

Arrest, Bail & Court

The Blue Bar of the Law

 

 BAIL 

Once a person has been charged with a criminal offence they are entitled to apply for bail. When at the Police Station, the authorised officer will make the bail determination. An authorised officer is an officer of or above the rank of sergeant or the officer in charge of the police station at the time. If that officer refuses bail, then the accused must be brought before the next court for a bail determination to be made by the court. If the court refuses bail the accused can force the matter to be adjourned for a period of no longer than eight (8) days before the bail is reviewed again. The accused can also appeal to the Supreme Court for a bail review. In such an appeal, the Supreme Court can impose a bail on the accused that it thinks fit.

The law with regard to bail is to be found within the Bail Act (NSW). There are presumptions, either for or against bail. For minor matters there is a presumption for bail. This right to bail can be affected by the intoxication of the accused, if the accused has previously failed to appear before the court or the person stands convicted of the offence. Section 9 groups offences to which there is a presumption in favour of bail. With regard to Domestic Violence Offences this presumption in favour of bail is removed. With regard to these offences there is no presumption either in favour or against bail being granted. Section 8A of the Act creates a presumption against bail for major drug offences.

When an accused is charged with an offence he or she is entitled to be handed a Form 1 and a Form 2 by the police to notify them as to the entitlement to bail. Further, if the court or the authorised officer either refuses bail, or imposes a conditional bail, the authorised officer or court must state the reasons why unconditional bail was not granted in writing. This again is a safeguard to ensure that a person's freedom is not interfered with unduly.

The most important section of the Act is section 32 as it sets out the criteria that the court or authorised officer is to follow when making a bail determination. No other criteria can be considered other than what is in that section and the relevant presumption. Factors that can affect bail are the person's background, community ties, criminal record and previous failure to appear before the court. The circumstances of the offence include its nature and seriousness, severity of the penalty and MOST IMPORTANTLY whether the person will appear to answer the charge. 

BACK TO INDEX

COURT 

In NSW there is a hierarchy of courts. The courts are as follows:

  • HIGH COURT
  • COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
  • SUPREME COURT
  • DISTRICT COURT
  • LOCAL COURT

BACK TO INDEX

Local Court

Over 90% of all criminal matters are dealt with in the Local Court. The matters that are dealt with in the Local Court to finality come under three categories:

  • summary charges;
  • indictable charges that can be dealt with summarily without the consent of the accused (Table 2 matters); and
  • indictable charges that can be dealt with summarily with the consent of the accused (Table 1 matters).

BACK TO INDEX

Summary Charges

A summary charge is a charge that can only be dealt with before a Local Court. With these charges there is no right for the accused to have the matter heard before a jury. The charge will be determined before a magistrate without jury who will decide all issues of both fact and law. Upon conviction of a summary charge there are avenues of appeal open to an accused. Such options include an appeal to the District Court on the basis that the accused is NOT GUILTY. The Judge in the District Court will then review the evidence to decide whether the accused is guilty of the offence appealed against or not. There is also a right of appeal to the District Court on the basis that the penalty imposed by the magistrate in the Local Court was too harsh. In these cases the Judge can review the case and either, increase the penalty, reduce the penalty or leave the penalty as imposed by the magistrate. On such appeals the Judge is restricted to the penalty that the magistrate could impose in the Local Court. 

BACK TO INDEX

Indictable charges

These are matters which were previously dealt with in the District Court as a trial before a jury. However, due to the costs of such trials the legislators passed legislation that these matters are to be dealt with as summary matters. These matters include offences such as assault, stealing and other property matters where the property value is under $5,000.00. A list of these offences is contained in Table 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act NSW. With these matters, only the prosecution can elect for the matter to be dealt with on indictment so that the accused will be sent to the District Court to face trial on those matters. If the matter is dealt with summarily, in the Local Court, then the maximum penalty the court can impose is reduced from what the penalty would be if the matter was dealt with in the District Court on indictment. A matter finalised in the Local Court can be appealed to the District Court in the same manner as a summary offence.

The Table 1 matters are also indictable matters. They are more serious than the matters in Table 2. Some of the offences are the same, for example, stealing. However, under Table 1 the limit of the Local Courts jurisdiction is $15,000.00. The offences in Table 1 are also listed in the Criminal Procedure Act. The penalties that can apply in the Local Court for offences that are listed in Table 1 are also restricted under the Criminal Procedure Act.

One important difference between Table 2 offences and Table 1 offences is that with Table 1 offences both the prosecution and the defence can elect for the matter to be dealt with on trial in the District Court. If that election is made, then the matter is dealt with as an indictable matter. 

BACK TO INDEX

Indictable Matters

Where an accused is charged with an indictable matter, or an election is made for a Table 1 or Table 2 matter the Local Court still has limited jurisdiction. Initially, when people are charged they will be brought before the Local Court. A bail determination may be required to be made by the court.

If the matter is a plea of guilty, then the magistrate will read the Police brief of evidence to ensure that there is sufficient evidence to have the accused committed to the District Court for sentencing.

If the matter is a plea of not guilty then the Local Court will set the matter down for a Committal Hearing. This is so the magistrate can assess the evidence of the Crown to ensure there is sufficient evidence to commit the accused to a trial in the District or Supreme Court. If the magistrate is of the opinion there is not sufficient evidence, he or she will then discharge the accused from the inquiry they have conducted and the accused is released. Note the magistrate cannot dismiss the charge in a committal and it is open to the police to recharge at a later date or apply for an ex officio indictment before the District Court. That is, the accused could end up facing a trial even if the magistrate discharges him or her from the committal hearing. 

BACK TO INDEX

District Court

The District Court, as indicated above, can deal with an appeal from the Local Court where the appeal is on the basis that the accused is Not Guilty or that the Penalty was too severe.

The District Court also conducts criminal trials on indictable charges after the committal proceedings in the Local Court have been finalised. In trials, the decision of guilt is determined by the jury. The Judge determines questions of Law and instructs the jury on the relevant law. If the accused is found guilty then the Judge also imposes a penalty upon the accused. 

BACK TO INDEX

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court also can do jury trials as the District Court can. However, in practice, trials in the Supreme Court are limited generally to murder trials and some other serious indictable offences.

The Supreme Court also can determine appeals from the Local Court on questions of Law or a mixed question of Law and fact. These appeals are heard before one Justice of the Court. On the hearing of such an appeal, the Justice can find that the magistrate was correct or that the magistrate was in error. If in error, then the Justice can quash a conviction, which means it is reversed and the accused is found not guilty, or may order the matter be remitted to the Local Court for further hearing. 

BACK TO INDEX

Court of Criminal Appeal

The Court of Criminal Appeal hears and determines appeals on questions of Law from the District and Supreme Courts. They also determine appeals on whether convictions in the lower courts are safe and satisfactory. The Court of Criminal Appeal usually has three Justices sitting on the bench when deciding an appeal but it can be as high as seven on special matters. 

BACK TO INDEX

High Court

The High Court can hear appeals from the Court of Criminal Appeal on a question of Law only. The High Court normally has three to seven Justices sitting on the bench when making a decision on appeal from the Court of Criminal Appeal. 

 

Page Design © Ian Hunter.