During 1998 alcohol was a causal factor in:
- 16% of fatal crashes (down from 19% in 1997)
- 15% of serious injury crashes
On Thursday, Friday & Saturday nights alcohol was a factor in
60% of fatal crashes. In 1996 of those drivers/riders admitted to
hospital with illegal BAC's - over 50% were high range, with young
driver's (17-25) having twice the incidence of illegal BAC levels.
Since RBT was introduced (Dec 1982) the proportion of
drivers/riders killed with illegal BAC's reduced from 40% in 1980/81
to 21% in 1996.
| ALCOHOL |
FATAL |
INJURY |
TOTAL |
| 1996 |
102 |
2055 |
2157 |
| 1997 |
115 |
1897 |
2012 |
| 1998 |
91 |
1939 |
2030 |
* RTA Figs
Breath screening
The NSW Police Service has approximately 1,900 alcolmeters
deployed in the field for initial breath screening. The Lion SD-2
device is currently in service, with new passive/direct devices
being evaluated.
Police may require a driver or front seat passenger instructing a
learner to undertake a breath test in the following cases:-
- stationary RBT and mobile RBT
- driver involved in a crash front seat passengers instructing a
learner driver
- driver detected committing offences
When a driver has a positive result or refuses to provide a
sample, they are placed under arrest and conveyed to the nearest
police station or RBT bus for the purpose of undergoing a breath
analysis.
Evidential breath analysis
The NSW Police Service has Drager 7110 evidential breath analysis
instruments located at 240 locations throughout the State, including
RBT.
A person required to undergo an evidential breath analysis, who
exceeds the prescribed concentration of alcohol, will be dealt with
by a Court in accordance with the following penalties:
|
Reading
|
Penalty |
1st Offence |
2nd & subsequent |
Risk
Factors |
|
Special
Range
.02 > |
Max fine |
$1,100 |
$2,200 |
Applies to:-
- commercial
drivers
- learners
- provisional
- persons under 25
with < 3yrs exp
- unauthorised
drivers
|
|
Max gaol |
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Disqualification |
- 3 months
- 6 months
- 6
months
|
- 6 months
- Unlimited
- 12 months
|
|
Low Range
0.05 >
|
Max fine |
$1,100 |
$2,200 |
2 times the risk of
having a crash |
|
Max gaol |
N/A
|
N/A
|
|
Disqualification |
- 3 months
- 6 months
- 6 months
|
- 6 months
- Unlimited
- 12 months
|
|
Mid Range
0.08 > |
Max fine |
$2,200 |
$3,300 |
4 times the
risk
Same penalties
as
|
|
Max gaol |
9
months |
12
months |
|
Disqualification |
- 6 months
- Unlimited
- 12 months
|
- 12 months
- Unlimited
- 3 years
|
|
Lic Suspension
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
High Range
0.15 >
|
Max fine |
$3,300 |
$5,500 |
25 times the
risk
Includes:-
- refuse breath
analysis
- hinder/obstruct
blood sample
- willfully alter BAC
|
|
Max gaol |
18
months |
2
years |
|
Disqualification |
- 12 months
- Unlimited
- 3 years
|
- 2 years
- Unlimited
- 5 years
|
|
Lic Suspension
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Refuse a drug test;
Wilfully alter the amount of a drug in blood/urine
|
Max fine |
$3,300 |
$5,500 |
|
|
Max gaol |
18
months |
2
years |
|
Disqualification |
- 12 months
- Unlimited
- 3 years
|
- 2 years
- Unlimited
- 5 years
|
Blood analysis following accidents
Legislation requires a medical practitioner or accredited
registered nurse, attending an accident patient at a hospital, to
take a sample of the patient's blood for analysis. Whilst this only
applies to specified road users, it is an offence for the health
professional not to take the sample and also for any person to
hinder or obstruct the taking of that sample.
Drug impaired driving
Police have the power to submit a person to a sobriety
assessment, if the police officer has a reasonable belief the person
may be under the influence of a drug, because of their manner of
driving or occupying the driver's seat. Subject to meeting
legislative requirements, police may arrest that person and convey
them to a hospital for the purpose of obtaining samples of blood and
urine for analysis.